<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brainstorming, Cognition, #lrnchat, and Innovative Thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.learnlets.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.learnlets.com/?p=1699</link>
	<description>Clark Quinn&#039;s learnings about learning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:31:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hazel wagner</title>
		<link>http://blog.learnlets.com/?p=1699&#038;cpage=1#comment-98414</link>
		<dc:creator>hazel wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.learnlets.com/?p=1699#comment-98414</guid>
		<description>I love the idea of learnlet, short learning segments, quick reads that make one think and apply quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the idea of learnlet, short learning segments, quick reads that make one think and apply quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://blog.learnlets.com/?p=1699&#038;cpage=1#comment-98402</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.learnlets.com/?p=1699#comment-98402</guid>
		<description>Clark, you&#039;ve articulated something I&#039;ve tried to clarify for myself in the past.  While I don&#039;t think Twitter chats are a panacea, I do think they have the potential for a lot of value.  (In other words, they&#039;re just another tool, and when you need a wood chisel, a wood chisel is just the thing you need.)  As you say, you&#039;re not limited to turn-taking.

I remember one lrnchat whose participants included a certain Big Name.  BN seemed perplexed and even distressed by the lack of structure.  To me, BN couldn&#039;t see how anything useful would happen without having designated presenters (dare I say &quot;thought leaders?&quot;).

lrnchat does has a tendency to lean toward &quot;ain&#039;t social media great?&quot;  As you say, though, anyone who&#039;s around can participate; there&#039;s no designated status, and the facilitators limit themselves to explaining the format and tweeting the session&#039;s questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clark, you&#8217;ve articulated something I&#8217;ve tried to clarify for myself in the past.  While I don&#8217;t think Twitter chats are a panacea, I do think they have the potential for a lot of value.  (In other words, they&#8217;re just another tool, and when you need a wood chisel, a wood chisel is just the thing you need.)  As you say, you&#8217;re not limited to turn-taking.</p>
<p>I remember one lrnchat whose participants included a certain Big Name.  BN seemed perplexed and even distressed by the lack of structure.  To me, BN couldn&#8217;t see how anything useful would happen without having designated presenters (dare I say &#8220;thought leaders?&#8221;).</p>
<p>lrnchat does has a tendency to lean toward &#8220;ain&#8217;t social media great?&#8221;  As you say, though, anyone who&#8217;s around can participate; there&#8217;s no designated status, and the facilitators limit themselves to explaining the format and tweeting the session&#8217;s questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

