<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meeting unreasonable needs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.learnlets.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.learnlets.com/?p=861</link>
	<description>Clark Quinn&#039;s learnings about learning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Training others on things you know next to nothing about…by not ‘training’ &#124; Workplace Learning Today</title>
		<link>http://blog.learnlets.com/?p=861&#038;cpage=1#comment-74127</link>
		<dc:creator>Training others on things you know next to nothing about…by not ‘training’ &#124; Workplace Learning Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.learnlets.com/?p=861#comment-74127</guid>
		<description>[...] Wickham gives a great example of ‘the model’ approach Clark Quinn recently wrote about. The idea is to think less about ‘training’ and think more about job aids. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wickham gives a great example of ‘the model’ approach Clark Quinn recently wrote about. The idea is to think less about ‘training’ and think more about job aids. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://blog.learnlets.com/?p=861&#038;cpage=1#comment-74119</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.learnlets.com/?p=861#comment-74119</guid>
		<description>That last sentence reminded me of Roger Schank&#039;s comment: it took the training profession 30 years to get the overhead projector out of the bowling alley.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last sentence reminded me of Roger Schank&#8217;s comment: it took the training profession 30 years to get the overhead projector out of the bowling alley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://blog.learnlets.com/?p=861&#038;cpage=1#comment-73891</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.learnlets.com/?p=861#comment-73891</guid>
		<description>The person who sent this responded with a subsequent note, which would be funny if it wasn&#039;t so tragic:

&lt;i&gt;Just thought you might be interested...
 
I attended a conference on my software this past weekend, and I signed up for the train the trainer track.
 
Everyone was promoting tool-based instruction (click here, press this button, etc).  It was kind of depressing.
 
None of the &#039;train the trainers&#039; mentioned anything about job aids, collaborative learning, etc.  Basically anything that you and other prominent bloggers talk about in your blogs or anything that I learn in grad school wasn&#039;t even mentioned.
 
ADDIE, however, was mentioned plenty of times,which was really comical because I was reading your recent post about ADDIE on my iPhone during one of the sessions.  I was even given a Jeopardy PowerPoint filled with questions about buttons and their functions so learners could &quot;memorize&quot; these.
 
Again, it&#039;s tough for young IDs who are trying to do things based on recent research, emerging practices, and new ideas from prominent ID bloggers when you have folks who haven&#039;t learned anything about the field for 30 years &#039;training the trainer&#039;&#039;. 
 
Anyway, all in all, It was very disappointing.&lt;/i&gt;

No doubt. Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The person who sent this responded with a subsequent note, which would be funny if it wasn&#8217;t so tragic:</p>
<p><i>Just thought you might be interested&#8230;</p>
<p>I attended a conference on my software this past weekend, and I signed up for the train the trainer track.</p>
<p>Everyone was promoting tool-based instruction (click here, press this button, etc).  It was kind of depressing.</p>
<p>None of the &#8216;train the trainers&#8217; mentioned anything about job aids, collaborative learning, etc.  Basically anything that you and other prominent bloggers talk about in your blogs or anything that I learn in grad school wasn&#8217;t even mentioned.</p>
<p>ADDIE, however, was mentioned plenty of times,which was really comical because I was reading your recent post about ADDIE on my iPhone during one of the sessions.  I was even given a Jeopardy PowerPoint filled with questions about buttons and their functions so learners could &#8220;memorize&#8221; these.</p>
<p>Again, it&#8217;s tough for young IDs who are trying to do things based on recent research, emerging practices, and new ideas from prominent ID bloggers when you have folks who haven&#8217;t learned anything about the field for 30 years &#8216;training the trainer&#8221;. </p>
<p>Anyway, all in all, It was very disappointing.</i></p>
<p>No doubt. Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
