Comments on: Explain versus describe? https://blog.learnlets.com/2014/02/explain-versus-describe/ Clark Quinn's learnings about learning Thu, 20 Feb 2014 06:08:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: Paulo Castro https://blog.learnlets.com/2014/02/explain-versus-describe/#comment-536984 Thu, 20 Feb 2014 06:08:20 +0000 http://blog.learnlets.com/?p=3724#comment-536984 Clark, here is my modest opinion. Description is never a bad thing, I agree. I just saw a football (soccer) game between Arsenal (UK) and Bayern Munich (Ger). At one moment, the camera showed a German player dribbling the ball into the opponent’s penalty area and how he was taken down by a defender to prevent him from scoring. The narrator described the action, which helped me to clarify what had happened. The description certainly helped me understand what I was watching. What I had just seen on a TV screen was now complemented by an explanation of the facts.

However, soon after the penalty kick was sanctioned, the commentators began to share their own opinions, with a bias in favor of Arsenal. A commentator expresses a personal opinion of the facts, often times influenced by past experience, favoritism, nationalism, commercial/business obligations, or some other kind of biased behavior.

My point is that describing will indeed support comprehension and enrich the learning experience. However, interpretation is a whole new process, involving more complex behavioral responses – I may or may not agree with the interpretation is the most obvious one. Often times, I find that commentators destroy the audience’s experience by adding doubt, confusion, and negative criticism. During a recent world football tournament I heard a commentator disrespecting the people of an entire country by calling them “A Little Country where nothing much is happening” – which was completely unnecessary.

Thank you for publishing this article. I have followed your publications for a while and find them very interesting.

Paulo Castro | @FullMind_Design | http://www.linkedin.com/in/pauloxp

]]>