Absolutely – generational differences have been such a pervasive myth that even some colleagues that will identify and point out learning styles etc. as myths still buy into it. It’s been hard to shift the conversation toward a more nuanced look, although a couple references I’ve been pointing toward recently include Leadens (2020) and Kriegel (2013).

I’ve recently re-read Anderson (1991) and your point about the assumption that humans are logical reasoners also hit home. From this view I think I’ve really started to share that frame that cognitive systems function function not logically but *rationally* in terns of cost/benefit – to such an extent that human behavior can become illogical and maladaptive to the observer. It’s also been interesting to see how the same concept takes on so many different names across different fields and schools of thought.

Looking forward to passing your post along, and would love to view the keynote if you have a link! Thank you!

-Nate

—
Anderson, J. R. (1991). The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review, 98(3), 409-429. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.98.3.409

Kriegel, J. (2013). Differences in learning preferences by generational cohort: Implications for instructional design in corporate web-based learning [Dissertation manuscript, Drexel University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/differences-learning-preferences-generational/docview/1336030330/se- 2?accountid=10003

Leadens, R. (2020). Pilot perception of automation use: A generational assessment [Dissertation manuscript, The University of North
Dakota]. Theses and Dissertations. 3106.
https://commons.und.edu/theses/3106

Finally, thanks for sharing your insights. I have your books on my shelf and I always feel enlarged reading your work!