There have been some great discussions swirling around the eLearning Guild’s mobile learning 360 research report team (along with the relative merits and flaws of the iPhone ;). The question came up as to whether the fact that mobile devices focus on communication means that they can’t really deliver learning. My response to this was:
Don’t think about formal learning when you think about mLearning. As David (Metcalf) points out in his mLearning book, think of a mobile device as a learning *adjunct*. It’s a broader view of learning, where we take our learning process and augment it with mobile components. And take a performance focus: what will make people perform better!
It’s NOT about delivering an entire motivating learning experience through a 2″ screen (it *can* be, but that’s not the point). Which typically only is needed when you have a full skill-set change needed. Practitioners and experts can get away with just the facts, ma’am.
SO, we might ‘communicate’ concepts, examples, even practice (though interactivity is still the big barrier in mobile, re: the standards issue Judy (Brown) rightly raised) as *part* of a learning experience.
Or ‘communicate’ job aids/information as performance support.
It’s useful, it can lead to learning, but we need a broader definition of learning when we talk about mobile learning.
And, as the discussion re: Treo/iPhone illustrates, as we asymptotically approach the full capability of a desktop, the cognitive capability asymptotically approaches a full learning experience.
What do you think?
B.J. Schone says
Hi Clark,
I think you’re absolutely right when you say that we shouldn’t think about formal learning when discussing mLearning. It took me a while to understand this; I was wrapped up in the course model, and I just couldn’t see how courses could be delivered using mobile devices. I finally made the connection one day when I was out shopping with my wife. I was waiting for her and I started surfing the web on my PDA. I set up an RSS reader and I was able to spend some quality time reading through my favorite eLearning, training, design, and development resources while waiting. It was time well spent – and I finally understood mLearning. I see the possibilities now…
I wrote about my mLearning experience on eLearning Weekly (You can read it here.)
Dave Kees says
I think Marshall Brain had some interesting ideas. As you probably know, Marshall Brain is the creator of the popular “How Stuff Works” website. He also wrote a novel called Manna. I don’t think it’s much as far as literature goes but it sets out some very interesting ideas as far as the future goes. The takeaway for me was a system that could interact and guide. I am working on a system like this called “Bob”.
Clark says
Of course, my favorite ‘future learning technology’ novel is Neal Stephenson’s “The Diamond Age”, a must-read for learning technologists. But I’ll have to check out Manna!