Learnlets

Secondary

Clark Quinn’s Learnings about Learning

Digital Gibberish

19 July 2007 by Clark 6 Comments

I have to admit that I‘m a contrarian sometimes, and this Digital Native Digital Immigrant thing was cute for a while, even useful for some awareness raising, but at the end of the day, I think it‘s false. The premise is that kids are growing up with a digital world, and that the multi-tasking nature of their lives is different leading to different expectations. The more sophisticated version of the argument is based in Vygotskian forms of psychology, where the tools you use change the way you think.

Consequently, we see calls for more use of media, games, community, etc. There‘s a push for shorter, more engaging content, less verbosity and more ‘presentation‘, etc. All good things, but for the wrong reasons.

This is a topic I‘m willing to be wrong on, but so far I don‘t see it. The extension to the Vygotskian argument is that it would have to be a whole new culture, but this sub-culture is still grounded in the prevailing mind-set of 21st century earth. So, wherever it‘s flourishing, it‘s still not fundamentally different.

Here‘s why: we still have the same wetware, and we‘re still processing the same languages and viewpoints. It‘s evolutionary, not revolutionary. Yes, there are and will be changes from an environment where more people can share their viewpoint (and see the controversy over Andrew Keen‘s view that the internet is destroying culture), but it‘ll be gradual, and from a learning point of view what‘s best is still what‘s best.

The funny thing is, all the stuff they‘re touting for the digital generation is really what‘s best for the older generation too (ecommunity, immersive simulations, rich media). We just couldn‘t do it before. So it‘s a fun argument to lobby for doing what‘s right, but it‘s based upon a false premise and that I can‘t abide.

It‘s ironic that I, who‘ve generally been a rebel (e.g. my views are further apart from the mainstream than either major party is from each other), am coming down with such a ‘establishment‘ view, but it‘s what my reason tells me. I‘m happy to be wrong, so let me know where I‘ve missed it.

Comments

  1. Clive Shepherd says

    19 July 2007 at 3:56 AM

    I’m with you Clark. It’s nonsense to believe that people are changing fundamentally because of recent changes to technology. Their behaviours, expectations, values and preferences might have shifted somewhat, as they always do from generation to generation, but basically they want the same things all humans have always wanted. Young people don’t want the older people that they encounter at work to try to be like them or to pander to their tastes – they’re happy with the generation gap. It’s more important that they adjust to the culture of work than vice versa.

  2. Greer Garnham says

    19 July 2007 at 7:33 AM

    I just wanted to leave a quick comment in regards to today’s blog. I agree that the way in which we learn and/or are taught, is different now to the way it was even 10 years ago. This, of course, will have an affect on culture but has created a sub-culture that, for many, is the only way that they know. When it comes to learning, the resources that are available to us now, greatly out-do those that were available a couple of years ago – so this has to be an advantage?

  3. Rory Chalcraft says

    20 July 2007 at 1:50 AM

    I like how you phrase it being evolutionary and not so much revolutionary, Clark. Perhaps it’s a matter of degrees insofar as the Millenials have a greater degree of facility with tech, they’ve a larger degree of media exposure and saturation, the degree to which they’ve been marketed, and so on.
    I’ve found the digital native vs digital immigrant useful insofar as (Marc Prensky said this to me) we immigrants ‘speak with an accent.’ It’s not that there is fundamental differences between the two. It’s more about the reactions of the groups given the same situation. And that is a difference of accent – for instance, an immigrant is more apt to print an email; whereas a native more often does not.

  4. Clark says

    20 July 2007 at 3:26 AM

    Clive, I like the ‘not being pandedered to’. There might need to be some accommodations at work to a ‘rip mix burn’ world, but it’ll be the organization adjusting to new capabilities, not HR accommodating new individuals.

    Greer, I don’t think we learn differently, but will agree that we know how to teach better, partly as a matter of having new technologies. But you’re right, while it’s true for all, we are better equipped.

    Rory, I didn’t touch computers ’til college, but I’ve programmed them, managed projects developing new capabilities and systems on them, and help people use them. Am I a native or an immigrant? My colleague is 10 years older than me, I don’t think he touched computers ’til college either, but his PhD thesis developed a read/write system for all available authoring languages, he’s a CTO, runs server farms for his clients/colleagues, and knows more about technology than 99% of people. Is he native or immigrant? I print papers when they’re longer than a few pages (not just email), but it’s about my eyes (reading at 96 dpi vs 1200), not about my brain. Yes, evolutionary, and maybe there’s an accent, but while my 10 year old can play games better than I can, I can explain *how* it does things and figure out how to problem-solve systems better than he. At least, so far ;).

    The one other thing I forgot to mention was the ‘multi-tasking’. I’m sorry, but ask any mother about multi-tasking. It’s not a new brain, it’s just a new set of technologies. Though I’m willing (or even inclined) to believe that the ability to share, edit, create, and publish may have some lasting changes on culture.

  5. Rory Chalcraft says

    20 July 2007 at 4:25 AM

    Clark, whether or not one is expert or more knowledgeable or more capable is not a differentiator between a native and immigrant. For instance, although I was born into an English speaking family and culture, I’ve met plenty of folks for whom English is not their native language and who nonetheless are better at composition than I.
    So my answer to both your questions is that you and your colleague are indeed immigrants.
    Does this change the substantial nature of how we learn? No. I think, like you stated, that we’ve just got better tools to work with now than before.

  6. Jay Cross says

    20 July 2007 at 7:05 PM

    There is a difference between how you and your son process information. He does not have the blinders we adults have learned to wear. We are ham-strung by our vestigial beliefs. Learning a new computer game or how to set your new digital watch provides an example. I have a tough time with either. My son gives it a whirl, with no prior knowledge, and things fall into place.

    Granted, you and I can pass for natives in some realms, e.g. navigating the web, but I think we’re blind to many things we locked in on when our young brains were open to new concepts.

    Unlearning is a bitch.

    jay

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Clark Quinn

The Company

Search

Feedblitz (email) signup

Never miss a post
Your email address:*
Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

Pages

  • About Learnlets and Quinnovation

The Serious eLearning Manifesto

Manifesto badge

Categories

  • design
  • games
  • meta-learning
  • mindmap
  • mobile
  • social
  • strategy
  • technology
  • Uncategorized
  • virtual worlds

Blogroll

  • Charles Jennings
  • Christy Tucker
  • Connie Malamed
  • Dave's Whiteboard
  • Donald Clark's Plan B
  • Donald Taylor
  • Harold Jarche
  • Julie Dirksen
  • Kevin Thorn
  • Mark Britz
  • Mirjam Neelen & Paul Kirschner
  • Stephen Downes' Half an Hour

License

Previous Posts

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006

Amazon Affiliate

Required to announce that, as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Mostly book links. Full disclosure.