Learnlets

Secondary

Clark Quinn’s Learnings about Learning

On Homework

15 March 2011 by Clark 6 Comments

In the ‘getting it off my chest’ department:

I gave a talk to a national society last week on the future of learning.   An off-hand comment on ‘homework’ got more interest than I expected.   My point was that there are limits to reactivation.   However, given the battles I know so many are having with schools on homework, and we too, some thoughts.

The underlying mechanism, roughly, for learning is associations between related neurons (and, at a bigger scale into patterns). However, our brains saturate in their ability to associate new information.   Some activation a day is about all a brain can take.   Re-activating is key, over time.   That is, the next day, and the next.   And, of course, the feedback should come quickly after the effort (not the next day).   And, let’s be real: some kids need more practice than others.   Why aren’t we adapting it?   And are we really rewarding achievement?   In elementary school, my first-born noticed that by being smart, he got more work than the other kids with the ‘stretch’ assignments, and wondered why being smart was punished!

So, in theory, a light bit of homework on a topic that was first visited in prior days might make sense. So you see it on Monday in class, say, and then visit it again in homework.   Note that reactivating it in class the next day in a slightly more complex problem is better.   And, as, John Taylor Gatto has hypothesized, everything we need to learn in K6 really ought to take only 100 hours to learn, if the kids are motivated.   With the feedback coming the next day, it will also be harder for the learner to be able to make the connection. This post I found while verifying the 100 hour claim is fascinating on the amount of time really necessary.

However, that’s not what we see.     I’ve seen my kids complaining about trying to solve more of the same problems they saw in school that day.   That’s not going to help. And it’s too much.   If every teacher wants to get an hour out of them, they’d be overloaded with homework.   This is middleschool, but the same problem manifests in K6, and I’m only dreading what comes next.

And then we get the ‘coloring’ assignments.   I’m sure the argument is something along the lines of ‘by seeing the information represented as they color, they’ll remember it’.   Sorry, no.   If they’re not applying the information, or extrapolating from it, or personalizing it, processing it, it’s not going to lead to anything but prettier classrooms for open house. I’m sorry, but don’t spoil my child’s youth to pretty up your room.   And it’s very clear that, at least in our school, largely the mothers are doing it.

And then there is the weekend homework.   I’m sorry, but I do believe kids are entitled to a life, or at least most of one. Why have work hanging over them on the weekend?   Now, if you give them long term projects and it replaces some homework, and they decide to put it off ’til the weekend, well, I suppose that’s ok, because I think interesting overarching projects are valuable (and bring in important meta-skills).   So then there’s the homework assigned on Friday that’s due on Tuesday, so supposedly you can get it done on Monday so it’s not really homework, but who do you think you’re fooling?

So, my first-born got hammered with homework the first year of middle school.   Worse, it was idiosyncratic; so it was luck of the draw whether your kid got a teacher who assigned lots of homework.   My school admitted that while the math teachers were pretty much in synch, the science department had great variability, and didn’t explicitly admit that they can’t do anything about it (*cough* tenure *cough*).   This had been going on, but now my better half had me behind her as she rallied the other mom’s into a persistent force against what was happening.   There’s now a homework policy, which still gets violated (oh, this is a honors class at highschool level, so we have to assign weekend homework).   Nope, sorry, don’t buy it.

My second has not been hammered by the first year of homework (luck of the draw, the science teacher who doesn’t believe in homework), and hasn’t had her love of schooling squelched.   The first, however, has had to have serious support by us to not turn off completely.   I really believe that the middle school (a good one) has a belief that the only way to deal with all these coddled elementary school students is to hammer them the first year. Frankly, I’m not convinced that most kids are ready for middle school in 6th grade.   But I’m getting away from my point and getting personal…

Some reactivation, within limits of the overall load can’t keep kids tied to desks hours after school’s out, can be understandable, but I’m inclined to believe that it’s not really that necessary. If we tap into motivation, we can accelerate learning and get more utility out of school.   Doing the same problems at night, overloading from too many classes, and weekend homework don’t really provide enough advantage to justify such assignments.

I’m not sure whether they’re teaching the principles of homework to teaching students, and whether there’s any education of existing teachers from whatever path, but we’ve got to get it right. If Finland can get by minimal homework, I reckon we can too.

Comments

  1. Rob Moser says

    15 March 2011 at 8:58 AM

    Wow.

    I’m still trying to get my head around the fact that D is in middle school. *boggle*.

    But then I got a giggle out of the mental image of you at parent-teacher night. Its one thing when the parents come to you with a complaint about too much homework, and another again when said parent can quote an entire body of scientific research showing why (some portion of) said homework is ineffective and counter-productive…

    Good luck!

  2. Greg Fach says

    15 March 2011 at 3:16 PM

    Hi Clark,

    I definitely agree with you that homework is getting out of control. As a prospective math teacher, however, I do see the value in some homework. There are certain things that students need to simply memorize and practice is the best way to do that. An hour a night however is a bit ridiculous. I think that 20 minutes a night is a reasonable expectation for students. I am a huge fan of projects though and I will substitute them for traditional homework whenever possible. I believe projects are able to develop a much deeper understanding of material and are usually more fun than traditional homework. Hopefully this will tap into that motivation factor that you mentioned.

    I love that you brought up the Finnish system. The more I read about their education system, the bigger fan I become. Here is a great article I found that summarizes their success.

    http://bertmaes.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/why-is-education-in-finland-that-good-10-reform-principles-behind-the-success/

  3. virginia Yonkers says

    15 March 2011 at 5:08 PM

    Well, I am on the other side of middle school (both my kids are in High School and my son takes some of his classes at the local community college). One of the major problems has to do with the scheduling. Once my kids schools went to block scheduling (my daughter goes to a different school than my son), there was less homework (less classes per day with longer class time) and they were given a couple of days to do their homework rather than 6 different classes giving homework for the next day.

    However, my daughter’s school is 100% project based learning. She and her classmates work together in teams on the project and at the beginning of the project (usually once a month they’ll start a new project), they are given all of the work needed (including 60% of most projects being individual “benchmarks”). They then develop a work schedule for the project with due dates and “benchmarks”. In fact, her homework ends up being more targeted and a lot more time consuming than her friends at the more traditional high school. There is much more problem solving involved and active learning. My son’s college class uses these same techniques. In both cases they have to have a certain level of self direction. Least you say that these are skills they can only develop when they are older, the two had a 4th grade teacher who used this style of teaching very successfully. Both my kids told me just last month that they can remember almost everything they learned in that class. While they had a lot of homework, it was not “busy work” as you describe it.

    In New York state, teachers are REQUIRED to assign homework of a half hour for each grade level. In other words, 6th graders should have 3 hours of homework a night, 12 graders should have 6 hours. This means that most of the mandated homework ends up being totally worthless because it is assigned because it is mandated, not necessarily out of any educational objectives.

    One last comment. As a child, I remembered my addition tables based on color. Don’t ask me how it worked, but it does for certain learners. I have seen it work with foreign language instruction. Of course, it doesn’t work when you have the parents doing the work!

  4. Clark says

    16 March 2011 at 8:02 AM

    Thanks for the feedback. Virginia, I love the project-based learning you cite. Wish I saw more of it. Service learning is another great opportunity. But I’m not sure we’re preparing teachers to do this sufficiently well; it is a different style of teaching.

    And I totally agree that assigning homework by amount of time is ludicrous. To paraphrase Gloria Gery, why not just do it by the pound?

    As for color, maybe for some, but let’s not have all students coloring a great huge poster with four math facts on it!

  5. virginia Yonkers says

    16 March 2011 at 8:51 AM

    Her school is an incubator for PBL and new technology. You’ll be happy to hear they have had a number of people come through to learn more about using PBL in their teaching from the Northeast, but also SD, NC, ME, and IN. So maybe there’s hope especially when you have many science education universities using PBL as a basis for teacher training.

  6. John Feser says

    17 March 2011 at 8:50 AM

    Clark,

    Great article and I completely agree. Anymore, it seems like homework is just as hard on the parents (not conceptually, but in terms of time and effort). I see the problem as teachers can’t get through all the material they want to (or are expected to) during a day and so they send it home for the parents to teach.

    I totally support parents being involved in their children’s education, but get us involved in the right way. I’d much rather get an email or a note saying “Susie is having trouble understanding the concept of negative numbers. Could you please work on this paper with her? I’d like to make sure she can keep up with the rest of the class.” That kind of homework makes sense to me.

    And speaking of ‘coloring’ assignments, could someone with a strong background in learning theory, please, please, please explain to me the educational value of a word-search. I want to throw-up every time one of my kids brings home a word-search. What am I missing? These things seem to appear in their book bags every few weeks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Clark Quinn

The Company

Search

Feedblitz (email) signup

Never miss a post
Your email address:*
Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

Pages

  • About Learnlets and Quinnovation

The Serious eLearning Manifesto

Manifesto badge

Categories

  • design
  • games
  • meta-learning
  • mindmap
  • mobile
  • social
  • strategy
  • technology
  • Uncategorized
  • virtual worlds

Blogroll

  • Charles Jennings
  • Christy Tucker
  • Connie Malamed
  • Dave's Whiteboard
  • Donald Clark's Plan B
  • Donald Taylor
  • Harold Jarche
  • Julie Dirksen
  • Kevin Thorn
  • Mark Britz
  • Mirjam Neelen & Paul Kirschner
  • Stephen Downes' Half an Hour

License

Previous Posts

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006

Amazon Affiliate

Required to announce that, as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Mostly book links. Full disclosure.