Clark Quinn's Learnings about Learning
(The Official Quinnovation blog)

9 April 2013

Increasing our responsibility

Clark @ 6:27 AM

InFormalI ranted a couple of weeks ago about how we need to move out of our complacency and make a positive change.  As I sometimes do, I stumbled upon a diagram that characterizes the type of change I think we need to be considering.

The perspective riffs off of the concept of the relative value of formal versus informal learning methods shift as performers move from novice to expert. (And, as I’ve previously noted, what’s considered in/formal changes depending on if you’re the performer or designer.)  And, too often, we tend to restrict our interventions to the formal side, yet there are lots of things we can be doing on the informal side.

InFormalLDPCRolesLargely, however, I see learning and development (L&D) groups as focusing exclusively on novices, or to beginning practitioners, and leaving practitioners and experts on their own.  Even if they’re addressing these more advanced audiences, they tend to use the ‘course’ as the vehicle, when it’s not really  necessary.  These audiences know what they need to know, and just want that useful information, they don’t need the full preparation that novices do.  Novices don’t know what they need to know nor why it’s important, so we provide all that in a course model.  We can be much more telegraphic to advanced performers, and the value of social networks starts kicking in here too.

The point I’m trying to make is that we can, and should, take responsibility for the rest of the performers. We can assist their performance, hence the term we’ve been preferring in the Internet Time Allianceperformance consultant.  This implies facilitating performance across the organizational roles, top to bottom and from beginner to expert.

I’d like to suggest that L&D groups need to become focused on facilitating organizational performance, which includes but is not limited to training.  It’s going to benefit the organization, it’s going to lead to greater strategic contributions and associated value, and it’s an approach that will likely preclude a long slow march to irrelevance and extinction.  Better the folks that understand how we learn and perform (and if you don’t, what are you waiting for?) take responsibility than having it devolve by default to business units and/or IT, eh?



  1. Turns out there’s a book on Performance Consulting. Have ordered it from the library, see if it’s what I’m talking about :).

    Comment by Clark — 9 April 2013 @ 7:36 AM

  2. Just ordered that book as well. I’m hoping to pull our organization into the performance consulting world too!

    Comment by Sarah — 16 April 2013 @ 9:11 AM

  3. Hi Clark, I can strongly recommend The Performance Consultant’s Fieldbook by Judith Hale. It’s a great resource, provides a whole of organisation approach and provides all tools etc in open source. Toward the end Judith groups ‘interventions’ into about six groups and then breaks them down into 15 families.. It’s quite interesting how few ‘interventions’ require formal learning and even fewer require L&D involvement.

    Comment by Pete riddle — 10 May 2013 @ 10:09 PM

  4. Clark you may also like to have a look at Courageous Training – Bold Action for Business Results. Great reading and looks at a concept called the training impact player puzzle and refers to Courageous Training Leaders as being a necessary part of the puzzle.. The ‘Courageous’ part refers to the courage required by the Training Leaders to commit to delivering solutions that directly support/align to organisational performance or strategic objectives.

    If you haven’t read it already, I hope you enjoy it:)

    Comment by Pete riddle — 10 May 2013 @ 10:27 PM

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress