Learnlets

Secondary

Clark Quinn’s Learnings about Learning

Benign role-playing

9 July 2014 by Clark 5 Comments

In #lrnchat  a couple of weeks ago on anxiety in learning, Shannon Tipton suggested that role plays are the worst.  Now, I know Shannon and respect her (we’re in synch, her Learning Rebels  movement very much resonates with my Revolutionary tendencies), so this somewhat surprised me.  We debated it a bit on twitter, and we thought maybe we should make the argument more extended, so here’s my take.

Her concern, as I understood it, was  role plays where a subset get up and play roles in front of the room are uncomfortable.  That is, there’re roles and goals, and they’re set up to illustrate a point.  And I can see that type of role play might create a problem for a non-assertive person, particularly in an uncomfortable environment.    (She mentions it here, and see the extended explanation in the comment.)

Now, a favorite model of mine is Ann Brown and Anne-Marie Palincsar’s reciprocal teaching.  In this model (generalized from the original focus on reading), everyone takes  a turn performing (including instructor) and others critique the performance.  Of course, there have to be ground rules, such as talking about the performance not the person, making it safe to share, small enough steps between tasks, etc.  However, the benefits are that you internalize the monitoring, becoming self-monitoring and self-improving.

As another data point, I think of the Online Role Playing as characterized by Sandra Wills, Elyssabeth Leigh, and Albert Ip.  Here, learners take roles and goals and explore virtually over time.  The original one they reference was done by John Shepherd and Andrew Vincent and explored the mideast crisis. Learners got engaged in the roles, and the whole process really illuminated the tensions underlying the topic.

When I put these together, I see a powerful tool for learning.  You should design the roles and goals to explore a topic, and unpack an issue.  You should prep learners to help them do a fair job of the role. And, most of all, you have to make it safe.  The instructor should be willing to take on the challenging role, and similarly be seen to fail, or maybe everyone does it in groups so no one group is in front, then you facilitate a discussion.  I’ve done this in my game design workshop, where everyone pairs up and alternates being a SME and being an ID.

I understand that performing is an area of fear for many, but I think that role playing can be a powerful learning experience without anxiety when you manage the process right.  Bad design is bad design, after all (PowerPoint doesn’t kill people…).  What say you?

Comments

  1. Shannon Tipton says

    9 July 2014 at 12:44 PM

    Her side of the story ;)

    Clark – I just want to start out by stating that I appreciate the concept of role-playing and understand why my fellow L&D professionals may use this technique to drive a learning point home. My challenge, however, is on a couple of levels. First, being the one you addressed regarding non-assertive adults. Not unlike forcing people into round-robin reading (Joe you read the first paragraph, Sally you the second etc) people have anxieties that as facilitators we cannot anticipate, and putting people in front of a room of their peers regardless of our best efforts, is potentially not a “safe” place and if used has to be very carefully managed.

    My second challenge is in the way role plays are designed using a quasi “Oreo” approach – saying something good, point out areas of improvement, then end on a positive note. We know adults stop listening upon hearing the “bad news”. Regardless of the level of positivity that surrounds the negative nugget, most adults will fixate on the negative. Therefore regardless as to how we buffer or moderate the constructive feedback (and let me be clear, I am talking simple constructive feedback, not rude/harsh/troll comments), we will naturally gravitate to what we have perceived to have done wrong, tuning out the good news. To help countermand this, it has been my experience you have to conduct feedback sessions in smaller groups with the facilitator actively moderating teh activity.

    I wholeheartedly support your idea of pairs and I personally like using triads. Three rotating roles, one who is practicing, one acting the role of being practiced upon, and the third person is the observer/note taker. Next in my toolbox are teach backs, where pairs can display and practice while teaching back the concept to each other. This allows for a safer place for adults to practice a concept rather than on a stage with others “judging” (in the students eyes), allowing for the focus needed to reflect and learn.

    Great debate, and I’m curious as to your other readers opinions.

  2. Shelly Blair says

    10 July 2014 at 4:16 PM

    Hi Clark & Shannon
    I appreciate the interesting debate! I like using role-play type of scenarios and think you both have an interesting take. I will say that I am not as interested in making a ‘safe’ place, because learning requires vulnerability and risk. It’s okay to be uncomfortable! In fact, the more comfortable you get with feedback, the more you will succeed. As facilitators in various settings we definitely need to role model this behavior, btw.

    Let me give you an example…Toastmasters clubs are created around this idea– that gentle but constructive feedback can help you improve. We use the sandwich method as well- something positive, area for improvement, and something positive. I find many times people are not used to receiving feedback and understanding the difference between ‘I can improve in this area’ and ‘I am terrible at my job.’ After receiving feedback and seeing others graciously receive feedback, even the more introverted folks are more comfortable. What’s more, by having members evaluate each other, we are teaching people to give gentle feedback that can make a huge difference in job performance. It much less scary to get regular gentle feedback then to find yourself surprised in an annual performance review. Just my 2 cents :)

  3. Shannon Tipton says

    11 July 2014 at 9:20 AM

    Shelly – thank you for taking the time to comment. I totally agree that learning requires reflection and risk taking. I am all for creating an environment where people can fail, people fail in real life so they need to be able to be allowed to fail in learning. Therefore my point was not to coddle the learner, but perhaps look at other ways where they can practice the skills being taught without having embarrassment be front and center in their minds. Another exercise that I am fond of is the “tag-out”. Let’s say we are teaching behavioral interviewing and we want people to role play the techniques – I act as the person being interviewed and we have an interviewer. When the audience senses the interview is going wonky they can tag out the interviewer. At the end of the exercise everyone who “tagged” must be able to explain why they wanted to “tag” in.

    What I am saying, in my opinion, is that there are better ways to set a learner up for success rather than plopping them in pairs in the front of a room of their peers. I mean, that’s not realistic is it? Then why go through the pain point? Besides by the time you get to the last pair they will be totally prepared to “perform” perfectly after hearing all the feedback – and that’s not learning either, that’s acting.

    As I said, I’m not opposed to role-playing in general – I just believe there has to be better techniques than what we have used in the past – as what is important is not how the learners behave in front of you (or the group) it’s how they behave when they are not in front of you or the group. Right?

  4. Michelle Baker says

    11 July 2014 at 11:06 AM

    Very intriguing debate…here are my 2 (or more) cents:

    Let me get this out in the open first: As a *participant*, I absolutely cannot STAND role play exercises. Next to “Death by PowerPoint” lecture, I’d say it’s my least favorite means of learning/training. I think I die a little bit inside when I’m participating in a session and the facilitator breaks out the role play. Ok, maybe that’s a bit much. ;)

    That said, as a *facilitator*, I can appreciate both sides of this debate: Clark’s take from a methodology standpoint makes a lot of sense to me. It CAN be a powerful tool for learning, without question. The key (in my opinion) – 2 nuggets from Clark’s post:

    1) “You should design the roles and goals to explore a topic, and unpack an issue. You should prep learners to help them do a fair job of the role. And, most of all, you have to make it safe.”

    2) “…when you manage the process right. Bad design is bad design, after all…”

    Ahem.

    I’ll go out on a limb and say most of the time, these things are NOT top of mind when a role play exercise is developed for a session. I’ve seen it too many times. The intentions might be good, but the execution is lacking in one or more of the areas above. I think the notion that many learning designers/facilitators are actually taking the time to be mindful and think through all of these factors simply isn’t realistic. There’s a lot of that “bad design” lurking out there, even among seasoned, skilled professionals.

    In my experience, the reality of role play is more along the lines of where Shannon is coming from – and from a practical place, I agree with her counterpart wholeheartedly. This is probably why I (as a fairly introverted person) personally can’t stand it. In fact, I just had this conversation with my boss about a week ago – he LOVES role play, but he is outgoing, competitive, loves attention and has very thick skin. Not everyone is like that, and not everyone is comfortable “acting” and ultimately receiving feedback in a large group setting. This goes back to creating a safe environment, having ground rules, etc…

    I, too, love the alternative of using a triad approach with rotating roles – rather than performing role play/re-enactments/simulations in front of the full class group. Digging into a case study or scenario this way provides that same “mock” environment, but without the larger, on-stage feeling.

    Thanks for pointing me to this discussion – good stuff!

  5. Rebecca says

    7 August 2014 at 6:45 AM

    I think role playing really has its place. I saw this first hand when I was doing a training on chaplaincy. In that scenario a family role play around death allowed everyone to develop an empathy for the situation of others in the scenario. Role play is used a lot in medical education. It is a useful tool for practicing you would interact with a patient or resident in a difficult situation – or a way to practice a new clinical teaching strategy. So, although I personally used to hate role plays, I’ve learn to appreciate that there are very good pedagogical uses for them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Clark Quinn

The Company

Search

Feedblitz (email) signup

Never miss a post
Your email address:*
Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

Pages

  • About Learnlets and Quinnovation

The Serious eLearning Manifesto

Manifesto badge

Categories

  • design
  • games
  • meta-learning
  • mindmap
  • mobile
  • social
  • strategy
  • technology
  • Uncategorized
  • virtual worlds

Blogroll

  • Charles Jennings
  • Christy Tucker
  • Connie Malamed
  • Dave's Whiteboard
  • Donald Clark's Plan B
  • Donald Taylor
  • Harold Jarche
  • Julie Dirksen
  • Kevin Thorn
  • Mark Britz
  • Mirjam Neelen & Paul Kirschner
  • Stephen Downes' Half an Hour

License

Previous Posts

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006

Amazon Affiliate

Required to announce that, as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Mostly book links. Full disclosure.