Learnlets

Secondary

Clark Quinn’s Learnings about Learning

Designing Learning Like Professionals

12 August 2015 by Clark 4 Comments

I’m increasingly realizing that the ways we design and develop content are part of the reason why we’re not getting the respect we deserve.  Our brains are arguably the most complex things in the known universe, yet we don’t treat our discipline as the science it is.  We need to start combining experience design with learning engineering to really start delivering solutions.

To truly design learning, we need to understand learning science.  And this does  not mean paying attention to so-called ‘brain science’. There is legitimate brain science (c.f. Medina, Willingham), and then there’s a lot of smoke.

For instance, there’re sound cognitive reasons why information dump and knowledge test won’t lead to learning.  Information that’s not applied doesn’t stick, and application that’s not sufficient doesn’t stick. And it won’t transfer well if you don’t have appropriate contexts across examples and practice.  The list goes on.

What it takes is understanding our brains: the different components, the processes, how learning proceeds, and what interferes.  And we need to look at the right levels; lots of neuroscience is  not relevant at the higher level where our thinking happens.  And much about that is still under debate (just google ‘consciousness‘ :).

What we do have are robust theories about learning that pretty comprehensively integrate the empirical data.  More importantly, we have lots of ‘take home’ lessons about what does, and doesn’t work.  But just following a template isn’t sufficient.  There are gaps where have to use our best inferences based upon models to fill in.

The point I’m trying to make is that we have to stop treating designing learning as something anyone can do.  The notion that we can have tools that make it so anyone can design learning has to be squelched. We need to go back to taking pride in our work, and designing learning that matches how our brains work. Otherwise, we are guilty of malpractice. So please,  please, start designing in coherence with what we know about how people learn.

If you’re interested in learning more, I’ll be running a learning science for design workshop at DevLearn, and would love to see you there.

Comments

  1. Shannon says

    12 August 2015 at 8:34 PM

    Clark – You touch on a topic that truly needs addressing. However, allow me to take a slightly different approach. My belief is that designing learning, needs to be treated as two areas – Designing & Learning. One critical to other, but treated on different levels. Learning creation without the proper foundation of the psychological learning process (not to be confused with brain science) but has a good user interface is as doomed to failure just as a solid learning element put into a poor design creation will fail. Both pieces of the puzzle must fit to produce a picture. As we have said many times before, it’s not the tool – it’s the human behind the tool. As is evidenced with Articulate Hero’s. There is wonderful content there which is both thoughtful toward the learning process and design elements all the while using a rapid authoring tool.

    The issue with L&D is that we fail to partner with the right people. We fail to recognize we have gaps, and subsequently we fail to address those gaps. So I’m less concerned about the less experienced among us who are trying to put into place an instructional design process within their organziations, rapid or not, than those who feel convinced that instructional design will singularly win the day – this is malpratice. When we build bridges to bring about both components of the art (and psychology) of design and the science of learning, is when we will create strong learning connections and any more there is no reason to work alone, even when we are one person departments. .

  2. Clark says

    13 August 2015 at 8:49 AM

    Shannon, we have science of design too, and it too is based upon our cognitive abilities. Take brainstorming, for instance: https://www.td.org/Publications/Blogs/Science-of-Learning-Blog/2015/07/How-to-Brainstorm So we should be professional and evidence based in our design processes as well as our design outputs. And I actually have more faith in people’s ability to get decent design than good learning, as we’ve seen much more examples. Also c.f. http://thenewid.com/2015/05/27/missing-the-point.html

    And yes, the tool can be used for good, but if it’s designed to support doing bad stuff (c.f. powerpoint bullets), it takes extra work to do good.

    I see a huge gap in science. The aesthetics not so much; the tools make it easy to get the look and feel reasonably right, but when you’ve got a multiple choice tool that only has one feedback response for all the wrong answers, you’re fighting an uphill battle.

    Thanks for the feedback.

  3. John Laskaris @ Talent LMS says

    20 August 2015 at 2:06 AM

    You touched on a fascinating and deep subject, Clark, I’m really glad this topic gets some recognition.

    I am always surprised just how quick can people learn, especially when they don’t do it consciously. In my opinion the most important point you have made is applying the knowledge. When you actually use your knowledge, you get intimate with the concepts behind and everything becomes a second nature.

    I would even say that after spending sufficent time applying a piece of knowledge, a conscious effort is needed to forget it – would you agree?

  4. Clark says

    20 August 2015 at 6:49 AM

    John, as we practice, our knowledge is compiled away, inaccessible. And we don’t ‘unlearn’, we have to learn ‘over’ or on top of our existing learning if we want to change. We either need to change triggers for application, or if we have the same trigger it really requires a painful overlearning process.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Clark Quinn

The Company

Search

Feedblitz (email) signup

Never miss a post
Your email address:*
Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

Pages

  • About Learnlets and Quinnovation

The Serious eLearning Manifesto

Manifesto badge

Categories

  • design
  • games
  • meta-learning
  • mindmap
  • mobile
  • social
  • strategy
  • technology
  • Uncategorized
  • virtual worlds

Blogroll

  • Charles Jennings
  • Christy Tucker
  • Connie Malamed
  • Dave's Whiteboard
  • Donald Clark's Plan B
  • Donald Taylor
  • Harold Jarche
  • Julie Dirksen
  • Kevin Thorn
  • Mark Britz
  • Mirjam Neelen & Paul Kirschner
  • Stephen Downes' Half an Hour

License

Previous Posts

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006

Amazon Affiliate

Required to announce that, as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Mostly book links. Full disclosure.