Learnlets

Secondary

Clark Quinn’s Learnings about Learning

Mindmapping

3 March 2016 by Clark 11 Comments

So, if you haven’t figured it out yet, I do mindmaps.  As I’ve recited before, I started doing it as a way to occupy my brain enough so I could listen to keynotes, but occasionally I use it to other purposes, such as representing structure or even planning. And thru  my esteemed colleague Jane Hart  (who’s Modern Workplace Learning book I’m going through and thoroughly impressed), I’m giving a mindmapping webinar today for a group of several universities in Ireland.  I thought I’d share what I’m presenting.

MindmappingMindmaps are a visual way of representing knowledge.  You use links to show connections between concepts (represented as nodes), developing a structural relationship.  A true semantic network would have those links labeled, as there are many different types of relationships (causal, precedence, hierarchical), but mindmaps typically have unlabeled links.  Still, mindmaps capture structural information in a visual way, that supports tapping into our powerful visual processing system. (This is the one I created for them to advertise the talk, it’s neither the order I ended up for them or am using here. ;)

You can add information to them; as a visual tool, you can add extra graphical information, like tables or charts, to augment the map.  You can similarly add color as a way to layer additional semantic information such as similarity. And the links can be plain or directional.  Importantly, while a mindmap can be essentially equivalent to an outline  if you maintain a strict tree structure, you can create a graph by having more complex links that generate loops.

The process of mindmapping is fairly straightforward: you have a central node, and then generate additional nodes and link them. I tend to go counter-clockwise, and include an arrow indicating that, because I’m capturing a linear presentation, but generating a static representation of information doesn’t have any directional requirement. I find that I have to frequently rearrange to fit the mindmap appropriately to the image, but that’s part of the benefit.

The evidence appears to show that mindmapping is superior to note-taking. I don’t do it all the time, but there are reasons to think you should.  The reasons, I believe, that it  is better is that you’re not just transcribing a presentation, but you’re actively parsing it to represent the structure. If you do take notes, you should be paraphrasing what you hear in your own words, to have active processing of the information. The additional effort to extract the structure as well is a form of valuable cognitive processing that elaborates the information.  Doing both, paraphrasing and extracting structure, would be a great way to really comprehend what you’re hearing.

As suggested, it’s helpful to mindmap talks, but it can also be a thinking tool, to analyze situations and sort out your thoughts or plan activities and add elements as you think of them. No real advantage over an outline, potentially (though the ability to add other graphics and to make non-strict maps may counter that), though I suspect some find the drawing and rearranging to be a nice physical overhead to facilitate reflecting.  And, of course, it can be an evaluation tool, asking someone to create their maps to see their understanding.

While there are dedicated tools for mindmapping, both applications and in the cloud, which will make creating and rearranging easier (I presume), you can use almost any drawing package (I use OmniGraffle). You could use Powerpoint or Keynote, and even pencil and paper (if it’s just for the processing) though it can be harder to revise.

So, that’s my riff on mind mapping.  I welcome your thoughts.

Comments

  1. Robi says

    3 March 2016 at 9:08 AM

    I think Mind Mapping is the way to go to get the creative thought process and solution process on hyper speed.

    As a Board Director (Secretary, Communication Officer, Fundraiser, anything-else-that-needs-to-be-done officer, lol) of the Non-Profit Slab City Community Group Inc, I hope to move our Board of Directors and the Community we serve to using Mind Mapping in Brainstorming sessions as my experience in other organizations has been a pleasant surprise of productivity.

    Just gotta get down to it and give it a try!

    I know Clark Quinn is a very smart man, so I would follow his suggestion from this post!
    Cheers!
    Robi
    Director
    SCCGI

  2. Peter Miller says

    3 March 2016 at 10:39 AM

    You might like to try TiddlyMap via http://tiddlymap.org/ ; it’s a plugin extension for TiddlyWiki. If you have your data chunked (as tiddlers) in TiddlyWiki, it’s fun to see it mapped.

  3. Linda Davis says

    7 March 2016 at 11:55 AM

    I use NovaMind for these tasks. Great library of icons, shapes and other visuals.

  4. Claire Rodkey says

    7 March 2016 at 12:08 PM

    I have been mindmapping for 25 years and agree with Clark that it excels as a creative tool. I can’t brainstorm without it! Mindmanager is an effective product.

  5. Jim says

    8 March 2016 at 6:15 AM

    I have been Mindmapping for years now. As a professional Sales and product trainer for an insurance company, I can give a an entire day CE class based a 1 page mindmap.

    It allows me to anticipate questions and to allow me to go deeper on a subject. I actually use a type of mindmapping in my powerpoints that allow me to present on any subject matter at a click of a “hotspot” within all my PowerPoints. That hotspot takes me to a mindmap slide that allows me to go to ANY PowerPoint I have.

    I use Mindjet to save my maps but my preferred method is to use a whiteboard just to get it out of my head and see the flow. I then shoot a picture on my phone of the map, think about it for a day or two and then “make it pretty” in Mindjet.

    Just my thoughts,

    Have a great mind dumping day!
    Jim

  6. Clark says

    8 March 2016 at 7:56 AM

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts, tools, and processes. Great stuff!

  7. Barbara Fillip says

    8 March 2016 at 10:35 AM

    I’ve used many different tools over the years, but CmapTool is my tool of choice. Note that while Cmap Tools was developed to do concept maps, what I do with it aren’t strictly speaking concept maps. I call them insight maps. You can see what I mean with some samples on my website: http://www.fillipconsulting.com/p/insight-maps.html. I’m a knowledge management practitioner, so I spend a lot of time helping teams reflect on their experience and identify insights or lessons based on that experience. The mapping is a way of documenting those insights and lessons without losing the context.

    I also recently created a short class to explain the process for developing such maps to support individual reflection. You can access it (free) on the Skillshare platform: http://skl.sh/1Vx3R2u.

    Sidenote to comment 2: Tiddlymap is very interesting as a way of combining a wiki approach with a visual mapping component, but you have to be familiar with TiddlyWiki as a first step, which isn’t for everyone. I personally love it… but I have yet to come across a mapping tool I didn’t like.

  8. Dennis says

    14 May 2016 at 4:39 AM

    Nice article, to the point. IQStrategix (http://IQStrategix.com) has an enterprise-class product that provides highly complex mind maps that model structural, behavioral, functional, and analytic thought to any level of granularity, and delivers that content on-demand. It’s the big, big, big brother of these handy apps mentioned. The goal of the enterprise is not to just transfer knowledge, but at its most sophisticated level, to leverage the knowledge of the organization. Creating a mind map is one thing, representing human thought is another.

  9. Clark says

    15 May 2016 at 9:39 AM

    Dennis, despite the pitch, I think it is important for others to see the larger picture. I also remember SemNet, now Semantica, but it’s more than a mindmap, it’s a concept map (e.g. labeled links). Powerful tools for representing knowledge, but I’ll challenge your last statement: a mind map is representing human thought. Perhaps not as robustly as a concept map, but capturing relationships nonetheless.

  10. Dennis says

    23 July 2016 at 8:44 AM

    Clark, granted, mind mapping tools are very helpful. I may have been over reaching. Our technology is an enterprise-class tool, so it is not fair to compare the two technologies. We use a mind mapping tool to drill down on our patent application points. Best wishes, Dennis

Trackbacks

  1. Physical overhead of Mindmapping | x28's new Blog says:
    4 March 2016 at 12:48 AM

    […] I have often argued for Cmapping and against simple hierarchical mindmapping, Quinnovation offers some plausible thoughts about the benefit of simple mindmaps: They may help understand the […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Clark Quinn

The Company

Search

Feedblitz (email) signup

Never miss a post
Your email address:*
Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

Pages

  • About Learnlets and Quinnovation

The Serious eLearning Manifesto

Manifesto badge

Categories

  • design
  • games
  • meta-learning
  • mindmap
  • mobile
  • social
  • strategy
  • technology
  • Uncategorized
  • virtual worlds

Blogroll

  • Charles Jennings
  • Christy Tucker
  • Connie Malamed
  • Dave's Whiteboard
  • Donald Clark's Plan B
  • Donald Taylor
  • Harold Jarche
  • Julie Dirksen
  • Kevin Thorn
  • Mark Britz
  • Mirjam Neelen & Paul Kirschner
  • Stephen Downes' Half an Hour

License

Previous Posts

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006

Amazon Affiliate

Required to announce that, as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Mostly book links. Full disclosure.