Learnlets

Secondary

Clark Quinn’s Learnings about Learning

Andragogy vs Pedagogy

13 April 2021 by Clark 23 Comments

Asked about why I used the word pedagogy instead of andragogy, I think it’s worth elaborating (since I already had in my reply ;) and sharing. In short, I think it‘s a false dichotomy. So here‘s my analysis of andragogy vs pedagogy.

Looking at Knowles‘ andragogy, I think it‘s misconstrued. What he talks about for adults is really true for all learners, taking into account their relative cognitive capability and amount of experience. So I fear that using andragogy will perpetuate the myth that pedagogy is a different learning approach (and keep kids in classrooms listening to lectures and answering rote questions). Empirically, direct instruction works (tho‘ it‘s interpretation is different than the name might imply, I once pointed out how it and constructivism properly construed both really say the same thing ;).  

There was an article  that posited five differences, and I see a major confound; the article‘s talking about andragogy as self-directed learning, and pedagogy as formal instruction. That‘s apples and oranges. It really is more about whether you‘re a novice or a practitioner level and the role of instruction. Age is an arbitrary element here, not a defining factor. Addressing each point:

1. Adults are self-directing learners. No, in things they know they need, they can be, but also they may have their bosses or coaches pointing them to courses. Plus, for areas where the adults are novices, they still need guided instruction. Also, owing to our bad K12 and higher ed, we’re not really enabling learners to be effective and efficient self-directed learners. Further, kids are self-directed about things they‘re interested in. But we make little effort to ground what we do (particularly K6) in any reason why this is on the syllabus.  

2. The role of learner experience. Yes, this matters, but it‘s a continuum. Also, you always want to base instruction on learner experience, because elaboration requires connecting to and building on existing knowledge. Yes, we do tend to do give kids abstract problems (particularly in math), which is contrary to good learning science. “Only two things wrong in education these days, the curriculum and the pedagogy, other than that we‘re fine.” Ahem. We teach the wrong things, badly.  

3. Adults generate interest in useful information. So does everyone, but that‘s not a matter of developmental level. Kids also prefer stuff that‘s relevant. We‘ve developed a curriculum for kids that is out of date, and we don‘t motivate it. Everyone has a curriculum, and there are degrees of self-direction, but it‘s not a binary division.

4. Adult readiness to learn is triggered by relevance (yeah, kind of redundant).Kids also learn better when there‘s a reason. Hence problem-based, service-based, and other such philosophy‘s of learning. Even direct instruction posits meaningful problems. Again, the article‘s comparing an ideal human learning model compared to a broken school model.  

5. What motivates learners are real life outcomes. Really, we‘ve covered this, everyone learns better when there‘s motivation. Children learn for grades because no one‘s made it meaningful for them to care!   Kids will pursue their learning when it makes sense to them. John Taylor Gatto made the case that kids could learn the entire K6 curriculum in 100 hours if they cared! Kids do learn outside of what‘s forced on them from schooling, be it Pokemon, polka, or porcupines.  

Thus, in the comparison between andragogy vs pedagogy, I come down on the side of pedagogy. It‘s the earlier term, and while ped does mean ‘kid‘, I still think it‘s really about learning design. Learning design should be aligned to our brains, not differentiated between child and adult. Yes, there are developmental differences, but they‘re a continuum and it‘s more a matter of capacity, it‘s not a binary distinction. That‘s my take, what‘s yours?

Comments

  1. Helena Schoeman says

    13 April 2021 at 9:57 AM

    I agree 100% !
    I’ve also changed the section on ‘How adults learn’ in my recent Train-the-Trainer courses to ‘How people learn’.
    Neuroscience and brain-based learning are far more important than distinguishing learning based on age.

  2. Clark says

    13 April 2021 at 1:17 PM

    Glad to hear. Not really a fan of ‘neuroscience’ or ‘brain-based’ either, as they’re either misleading (former) or redundant (latter), but there are worse things out there ;).

  3. Saul Carliner says

    16 April 2021 at 4:12 PM

    Good points, Clark.
    FWIW: The more I teach adults, the more I see similarities to younger age groups.

  4. Charles Jennings says

    19 April 2021 at 9:29 AM

    Really good points, Clark. Life can be easier if you turn a continuum into neat categories. We do it all the time. It may not be right, but it’s easier. The andragogy vs pedagogy categoration has always bothered me. Where’s the line between the two? Is there a line? I doubt it. There may be differences in levels of experience and levels of mastery that determine different approaches for formal instruction, but not based on age.
    I’ve used the term ‘how adults learn’ in the past. Like Helena, going forward I’ll revert to ‘how people learn’. If we take Eric Kandel’s view into account we may need to extend even beyond humans….

  5. DuquesneDave says

    19 April 2021 at 1:12 PM

    I 100% agree with you here, Clark. I’ll tell you – I have found VERY valuable strategies in Harry Wong’s “The First Days of School” that can (with a little tweaking) be perfectly applied to the adult learning environment. I’ve been saying this for a long time and I’m glad to see an L&D name that I respect saying it, too. Tells me I’m on the right track!

  6. Muhammad Owais Siddiqui says

    21 April 2021 at 1:46 AM

    Interesting to read your analysis on this topic. Looking forward to reading more of such stuff.

  7. Clark says

    21 April 2021 at 7:51 AM

    Thanks for the feedback. As I read the comments (here and on LinkedIn), I realize that Knowles may well have been suggesting don’t teach adults like you teach kids. My fear, as I expressed, is that it normalizes what we do to kids in the name of education. Instead, I want to say “don’t do to kids what we’re currently doing”, it’s not aligned with what we know about how learning works best. Back to my claim “only two things wrong with education, the curriculum and the pedagogy, other than that it’s fine”.

  8. Cynthia Moyes says

    22 April 2021 at 8:48 PM

    Yep. The strength of my homeschooling is I taught my children as though they were adults wherever appropriate. Let them be self directed in their learning, and made it relevant. They NEVER fell behind the “standards” because they learned that learning is FUN (gasp) and RELEVANT and they became competent. This developed the confidence and motivation to excell. Now bringing those experiences to adult instructional design. I have always been so confused why we knowingly educate our children with these old methods.

  9. Catherine Zaranis says

    23 April 2021 at 1:21 PM

    Hi Clark,

    I love a good discussion and debate on learning and the topics and points you raise have come in discussions that I have had with learning professional throughout the years. And I can appreciate that American or Anglo-saxon learning professionals may have a tendency to seek one word that applies to many things. The English language is this way. We have one word that means many things. For example the word love. In the English language we use language to describe the many kinds of love.

    Whereas in the Greek language, we have different distinct words for specific types of love, such as, Agápe (ἀγάπη agápÄ“[1]) means “love: esp. brotherly love, charity; Éros (ἔρως érōs) means “love, mostly of the sexual passion”; Philia (φιλία philía) means “affectionate regard, friendship”, usually “between equals”, Storge (στοργή storgÄ“) means “love, affection” and “especially of parents and children”, Philautia (Greek: φιλαυτία, romanized: philautía) means “self-love”. Xenia (Greek: ξενία) is an ancient Greek concept of hospitality. And while these are all expression of love, however the intended receivers are different.

    As a bicultural Greek-American learning and performance professional, I like to use both of these Greek words, Andragogy and Pedagogy. Andragogy meaning leading man in Greek and Pedagogy meaning leading children. It is more clear who is the receiver and adult (>25 years, prefrontal cortex fully developed) vs a child (25 because of the many more years of experience that they could bring to each learning experience.

  10. Clark says

    23 April 2021 at 3:21 PM

    Catherine, thanks for that exposition. (And thanks to others for some stories and comments.). My point is that if we differentiate between child and adult, we might prejudice one or the other. My take is that Knowles wanted to separate out adult learning from what is done to kids. I want to not let a vibrant picture of adult learning allow kids to still suffer in schools. Interesting that you put the barrier at 25. Many have suggested that the cognitive capacity is capable at roughly high school. I think any age is arbitrary, particularly since our learning mechanisms really don’t change. Sure, we might have more limited working memory capacity at very young ages, and certainly our experience base expands consistently, but that doesn’t mean we don’t all benefit from meaningful projects with guidance and feedback.

  11. Debbie Deale says

    30 April 2021 at 3:00 PM

    As a previous elementary educator who now works with adults, I COMPLETELY agree! I am most curious about how we make instruction design/delivery decisions for novice vs expert learners. Have you encountered research related to this?

  12. Clark says

    1 May 2021 at 4:15 PM

    Debbie, in general, if they’re novices, they’ll need fully contextualized and motivating instruction. With more expertise, they tend to know what they need to know, and just need it, so it’s more about resources than courses (e.g. LXP instead of LMS). Also, making it accessible/findable. Unless I’m misinterpreting your question.

  13. Kelly Martin says

    4 May 2021 at 9:01 AM

    I have always said that people and their behaviors have not changed throughout the ages, and I think, if I am interpreting your point correctly, that this point can be applied to learning…that how we learn has not changed. As you note in one of your comments, certainly the brain develops with age (in terms of working memory capacity etc.). However, at the same time we need to acknowledge what learning is and how it is constructed. In other words, we need to pedagogically focus on at from which point or in which scenario the learner is “starting”: as a novice, as one with emerging knowledge and/or skills, or as a “master” or “expert.” ( I do recognize these are broad categories and that other factors come into play such as disabilities.)

    It would seem that the learner’s needs and experiences, “situation,” and motivations play a significant role in pedagogy, whether the learning is based on a systematized structure–as in K-12, higher-education, and most professional training initiatives–or is outside of the pre-defined and arbitrary lines/rules/systems.

    Coming to mind are personalized learning vs. standardized learning and the No Child Left Behind Act…curious about your thoughts on these topics.

    PS: Appreciate your claim that “only two things [are] wrong with education, the curriculum and the pedagogy, other than that it’s fine”. Such a powerful and poignant point!

    Thank you,

    Kelly

  14. Clark says

    4 May 2021 at 11:54 AM

    Thanks for the feedback, Kelly. I’m a fan of personalized learning, and other such initiatives, but only after we first get the pedagogy right. I too often see people going for the flash before the form’s been taken are of. Overall, I’d say aligning with learning science is the first, and best, investment. A shiny bad design is still a bad design… As for NCLB, and even Common Core, I still think the PISA style curricula and assessment aren’t right, as I’m not the first to point out.

  15. Purva says

    5 May 2021 at 4:57 PM

    Nice write up. I am glad that there are people who think like me. Thanks!

  16. Jenny Erickson says

    6 October 2021 at 3:56 PM

    I’m a former teacher turned ID student.
    The tendency to discard pedagogy in ID always bothered me. I still see so much relevance even with adults. I love this idea of a continuum. It truly articulates the very thing I have felt while studying androgyny. Thank you for sharing.

  17. Willy Donuts says

    8 October 2021 at 7:48 AM

    I think it is important to note that article doesn’t truly speak to andragogy. Nor did Knowles ever intend the two to be different. Knowles actually says to use both regardless of who you are teaching.

  18. Clark says

    8 October 2021 at 8:44 AM

    True that I didn’t cite him directly, I was pointing to specific things mentioned in an article. Also, the principles I cited were five of six he’s linked to. In addition, he ultimately changed to say both, but if he didn’t intend them to be different, why did he create a separate term instead of just suggesting what good learning is?

  19. Blair Kettle says

    8 October 2021 at 5:14 PM

    Clark,

    You’re right that in many ways pedagogy and andragogy can be construed as the same. But it’s worth noting that andragogy is a brand name, Knowles’ brand name for his theory of adult education. Andragogy is to adult education what Xerox is to photocopiers and Hoover is to vacuums.

    Knowles wasn’t interested in how pedagogy and andragogy were alike. Quite the opposite. He made effort to emphasize the differences. In these ways he was as much a marketer as he was an educationist.

    Though andragogy, and the whole field of adult education, is ideology Knowles called it a technology. The irony is that technology means applied science and there is no science to the field of adult education or andragogy. Since at least the days of Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow adult education has been imbued with humanistic ideals. There’s a characteristic lexicon that threads through the literature of andragogy and the broader adult education field: words like independent, empowerment, voluntary, agency, respect, self-directing, self-evaluating, etc., are common punctuations. If andragogues and adult educators a US political stripe they would be progressive Democrats. In Canada they would be the New Democratic Party. In music they’d be Pete Seeger.

    Pedagogy also isn’t known for its strong inclinations as a field of science. There’s much more art and craft to the field than science. In that way andragogy +AE and pedagogy are similar. But pedagogy is much less driven by global ideological ideas.

    I think that pedagogy is only remotely similar to instructional design (I hate the term learning design). Talk to a middle or secondary school teacher and most won’t understand how it’s possible to ‘design’ for a subject that they don’t have some academic expertise in. They don’t grasp the idea of subject matter experts.

    Secondary teacher education programs require students to have teachable subjects. They subscribe to the view that effective teaching practices necessarily lie within the structures of the subject matter. Hence they offer what are known as disciplinary methods courses. In other words, to teach science, mathematics, history etc you must learn the domain-specific methods. Thus you get people who do masters and PhD degrees in mathematics, science and English literature education. That view of education hasn’t translated to instructional design.

    Part of the problem with andragogy is that it’s forever tied to Malcolm Knowles. The brand owner is long dead.

  20. Allison Kim says

    17 October 2021 at 5:24 AM

    I would like to chime in. I love reading all the responses about this very interesting topic. I have been in education the past 20 years, I have taught everything from pre-school to high education, general and special education. I then went on to specialize and am a board certified behavior analyst. I am now actively transitioning in the field of ID and am already learning so much from everyone. I’ll be the first to say I am new to this world and still learning however…
    I would like to point out that the study on Direct Instruction was a HUGE research piece done by the federal government showing tremendous outcomes. My understanding is ID has pieces from the cognitive, constructivism and behaviorism approaches. As a former classroom teacher but now behavior analyst, I want to make sure that others know there is an applied science called ABA (Applied Behavior Analysis). It is a science of teaching by understanding human behavior principles.
    It is THE most effective tool I have ever had as a teacher (no matter age, cognitive functioning, place of teaching environment) and is a science field of learning used in a wide multitude of populations, ages and environments. Direct Instruction has a TON of ABA teaching components in it.
    With that being said, I just feel that trying to tease apart androgogy and pedagogy in a component analysis — we could… but we just might be missing the mark if there is an applied field of science that has 40 years of research, ooodles of journals in various professions who use it that back up it’s effectiveness teaching/learning.
    Just my thoughts.

  21. Kent Clizbe says

    24 November 2021 at 6:48 PM

    Example of the difference between adult learning and kid learning:

    A basic kid curriculum is filled with large chunks of memorization and practice of basics: alphabets, numbers, spelling lists, parts of speech, times tables, trigonometric formulas, parts of a plant, taxonomy of mammals, addition and subtraction practice sets, handwriting (or key-boarding), and much, much more. Designing learning for kids that skips these foundations has quite disappointing results.

    Once kids are adults, and have the broad foundational knowledge that should result from a well-rounded K-12 curriculum, (or remnants of it, and know how to find what they don’t remember), then learning activities can focus more on exploration and practicing the objective knowledge or skills.

    Yes, humans all share common cognitive and emotional characteristics, but children and adults are different.

  22. Clark says

    26 November 2021 at 3:18 PM

    Kent, thanks for engaging. What you’re talking about is the curriculum, not the pedagogy. Kids need skills too: not just all those elements, but also how and when to apply them. Further, kids will learn better when it’s active, meaningful, etc. That’s what makes a foundation that sticks so it’s available as adults. Kids need knowledge and skills, and adults need knowledge and skills. Yes, there are knowledge differences, but how our brains develop these doesn’t fundamentally change as we age.

Trackbacks

  1. What is Adult Learning? - Train Like a Champion says:
    10 January 2022 at 5:00 AM

    […] 12 is adult learning theory. You can also check out the debate between andragogy and pedagogy and Clark Quinn’s LearnLets. If you take a look at show notes, or if you just go Google andragogy versus pedagogy – Clark […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Clark Quinn

The Company

Search

Feedblitz (email) signup

Never miss a post
Your email address:*
Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

Pages

  • About Learnlets and Quinnovation

The Serious eLearning Manifesto

Manifesto badge

Categories

  • design
  • games
  • meta-learning
  • mindmap
  • mobile
  • social
  • strategy
  • technology
  • Uncategorized
  • virtual worlds

Blogroll

  • Charles Jennings
  • Christy Tucker
  • Connie Malamed
  • Dave's Whiteboard
  • Donald Clark's Plan B
  • Donald Taylor
  • Harold Jarche
  • Julie Dirksen
  • Kevin Thorn
  • Mark Britz
  • Mirjam Neelen & Paul Kirschner
  • Stephen Downes' Half an Hour

License

Previous Posts

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006

Amazon Affiliate

Required to announce that, as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Mostly book links. Full disclosure.