Learnlets

Secondary

Clark Quinn’s Learnings about Learning

Doing Gamification Wrong

22 June 2021 by Clark 8 Comments

roulette wheelAs I’ve said before, I’m not a fan of ‘gamification’. Certainly for formal learning, where I think intrinsic motivation is a better area to focus on than extrinsic. (Yes, there are times it makes sense, like tarting up rote memory development, but it’s under-considered and over-used.)  Outside of formal learning, it’s clear that it works in certain places. However, we need to be cautious in considering it a panacea. In a recent instance, I actually think it’s definitely misapplied. So here’s an example of doing gamification wrong.

This came to me via a LinkedIn message where the correspondent pointed me to their recent blog article. (BTW, I don’t usually respond to these, but if I do, you’re going to run the risk that I poke holes. 😈) In the article, they were talking about using gamification to build organizational engagement. Interestingly, even in their own article, they were pointing to other useful directions unknowingly!

The problem, as claimed, is that working remote can remove engagement. Which is plausible. The suggestion, however, was that gamification was the solution. Which I suggest is a patch upon a more fundamental problem. The issue was a daily huddle, and this quote summarizes the problem: “there is zero to little accountability of engagement and participation “.  Their solution: add points to these things. Let me suggest that’s wrong.

What facilitates engagement is a sense of purpose and belonging. That is, recognizing that what one does contributes to the unit, and the unit contributes to the organization, and the organization contributes to society. Getting those lined up and clear is a great way to build meaningful engagement. Interestingly, even in the article they quote: “to build true engagement, people often need to feel like they are contributing to something bigger than themselves.” Right! So how does gamification help? That seems to be trying to patch a  lack of purpose. As I’ve argued before, the transformation is not digital first, it’s people first.

They segue off to microlearning, without (of course) defining it. They ended up meaning spaced learning (as opposed to performance support). Which, again, isn’t gamification but they push it into there. Again, wrongly. They do mention a successful instance, where Google got 100% compliance on travel expenses, but that’s very different than company engagement. It’s  got to be the right application.

Overall, gamification by extrinsic motivation can work under the right circumstances, but it’s not a solution to all that ails an organization. There are ways and times, but it’s all too easy to be doing gamification wrong. ‘Tis better to fix a broken culture than to patch it. Patching is, at best, a temporary solution. This is certainly an example.

 

Comments

  1. James Hron says

    22 June 2021 at 10:14 AM

    Hi Mr. Quinn,

    My name is James Hron – I’m a teacher turned Instructional Designer.

    I agree with most everything you mentioned in this post. Though I remain a fan of gamification in lots of areas, I do believe it’s overused (and most of it ends up very “surface-level”).

    One item I wanted to bring up and hear your thoughts on, is the transition from extrinsic to intrinsic motivation, specifically through gamification?

    When I was teaching full time, I witnessed this transition while using gamification techniques. Students would first be engaged extrinsically – but the motivation would transition to intrinsic. One example was from my engineering class. Students had to create automated systems and robots to complete tasks. Each time they created one, they earned money. The money could be used to purchase rewards for themselves. This was all extrinsic motivation. However, I started showing off a leader board at the end of each class, showing which group had the most money. I saw, in a few students, a shift in motivation. They wanted to earn more money – not to buy rewards, but so they would be first!

    I’m curious if you’ve seen examples of this shift from extrinsic to intrinsic motivation, or any thoughts you have on it?

    Thank you – I very much enjoy reading your learnlets!

    -James Hron

  2. Wendy Fritz says

    23 June 2021 at 12:04 PM

    Standing ovation. Thank you!

  3. Dave says

    24 June 2021 at 6:42 AM

    Agreed. Plus, gamification is hard to implement well even in a circumstance that suits it. It can accidentally incentivize an undesired behavior that ends up being a more efficient way to “win”. Even people who design games professionally struggle with this, where elements of the system essentially break and lead to emergent (and sometimes unfair) strategies. Really cool when you’re talking about game theory, but problematic when you want people to learn a specific thing.

  4. Clark says

    24 June 2021 at 11:35 AM

    Thanks for the comments. James, if their motivation is money, not understanding engineering, I think you can get to the type of problem Dave mentions, people finding ways to win without actually focusing on the desired learning outcomes. My focus would be on trying to find out why learning programming is important, and link that to the ability to make robots do things. Program a robot to rescue an animal, deliver needed drugs, … the success is when the recognizably desirable outcome is achieved. My $0.05.

  5. Robb says

    28 June 2021 at 12:34 PM

    Competition and “earning money” are great examples of extrinsic motivators. To internalize the motivation, share the speed at which tasks were completed, or the efficiency in number of steps or reduction in lines of code – those are intrinsic to the task.

  6. Dave says

    6 July 2021 at 9:43 AM

    I’m not so sure about that Robb. Isn’t the result there going to lead to something where people cut corners to do it quickly? Easy to fall into a “letter of the law but not the spirit of the law” situation.

    This is why any gamification is so difficult and so easy to implement sub-optimally. Heck, professional game designers get this wrong frequently!

  7. Ben says

    8 July 2021 at 5:54 AM

    I agree and I think you hit the nail on the head in your last paragraph where yo say that extrinsically motivated gamification doesn’t work. The research is actually pretty aligned on that point. What does work is deeper more intrinsically motivated gameful design. Contrary to popular belief, what makes games motivating isn’t surface-level things like accumulating points but things like support for player autonomy and the way games support mastery by supporting trial and error and incremental improvement. These are the things that we need to build into education

  8. Clark says

    8 July 2021 at 11:39 AM

    Ben, agreed. I’d go further, and say that making the task obviously relevant, and the context meaningful also are parts of the picture. There’s a list of eight elements that were the core of my alignment between effective education and engaging experiences (c.f. https://blog.learnlets.com/2009/11/engaging-learning/) that I think are critical. Thanks for weighing in!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Clark Quinn

The Company

Search

Feedblitz (email) signup

Never miss a post
Your email address:*
Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

Pages

  • About Learnlets and Quinnovation

The Serious eLearning Manifesto

Manifesto badge

Categories

  • design
  • games
  • meta-learning
  • mindmap
  • mobile
  • social
  • strategy
  • technology
  • Uncategorized
  • virtual worlds

Blogroll

  • Charles Jennings
  • Christy Tucker
  • Connie Malamed
  • Dave's Whiteboard
  • Donald Clark's Plan B
  • Donald Taylor
  • Harold Jarche
  • Julie Dirksen
  • Kevin Thorn
  • Mark Britz
  • Mirjam Neelen & Paul Kirschner
  • Stephen Downes' Half an Hour

License

Previous Posts

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006

Amazon Affiliate

Required to announce that, as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Mostly book links. Full disclosure.